Rice v. Madock

New York Court of Common Pleas

Rice v. Madock

5 N.Y.S. 958, 25 N.Y. St. Rep. 1040, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2777

New York Court of Common Pleas·Decided June 20, 1889·Published

Opinion

Per Oubiam.

In this case the judgment Of affirmance as by default will be opened, and the case set down for the next general term on the payment o£ $10 costs and the appellant giving respondent a bond to pay the amount of the judgment, should it be affirmed. If these conditions are not complied with in 10 days after service of an order to this effect on appellant’s attorney, the judgment of affirmance will stand.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Oubiam.

In this case the judgment Of affirmance as by default will be opened, and the case set down for the next general term on the payment o£ $10 costs and the appellant giving respondent a bond to pay the amount of the judgment, should it be affirmed. If these conditions are not complied with in 10 days after service of an order to this effect on appellant’s attorney, the judgment of affirmance will stand.

Rice v. Madock, 5 N.Y.S. 958, 25 N.Y. St. Rep. 1040, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2777 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).

Pincite

5 N.Y.S. 958 (Rice v. Madock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.