Rice v. Kinney

101 A. 344, 257 Pa. 130, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 692
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 12, 1917
DocketAppeal, No. 343
StatusPublished

This text of 101 A. 344 (Rice v. Kinney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rice v. Kinney, 101 A. 344, 257 Pa. 130, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 692 (Pa. 1917).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This appeal ‘is from the action of the court below in dismissing exceptions to the confirmation of a sheriff’s deed for property of the appellant, sold on an execution issued May 9,1916, upon a judgment entered against him on a verdict on July 11,1914. Nothing whatever appears showing that the court below erred in dismissing the exceptions. If the appellant was aggrieved by its action on his rule to show cause why the judgment should not be vacated, the verdict set aside, and a new trial granted, his remedy was by appeal from such action within the statutory period.

Appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 A. 344, 257 Pa. 130, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rice-v-kinney-pa-1917.