Rice v. Kijakazi

• Court: District Court, E.D. Washington
• Decided: September 29, 2020
• Docket: 4:20-cv-05175
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

3 FILED IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 4 Sep 29, 2020 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 7 CARRIE R., No. 4:20-CV-05175-MKD 8

9 Plaintiff, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 10 vs. 11

12 ANDREW M. SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 13 SECURITY, 14 Defendant. 15 16

17 Plaintiff filed an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on August 17, 18 2020. ECF No. 2. The alleged household income and resources exceed what the 19 Court deems to be the income and resources of an indigent household. Therefore, 20 Plaintiff’s household has sufficient means to cover the cost of the filing fee and 21 administrative fee. Accordingly, IT IS RECOMMENDED: 22 1. Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 2) be 23 DENIED. 24 2. Plaintiff be required to pay the filing fee and administrative fee in full 25 within thirty (30) days of an Order adopting this Report and Recommendation. 26 OBJECTIONS 27 Any party may object to a magistrate judge’s proposed findings, 28 recommendations or report within fourteen (14) days following service with a copy 1|| thereof. Such party shall file written objections with the Clerk of the Court and 2|| serve objections on all parties, specifically identifying any the portions to which objection is being made, and the basis therefor. Any response to the objection 4|| shall be filed within fourteen (14) days after receipt of the objection. Federal Rule 5|| of Civil Procedure 6(d) adds additional time after certain kinds of service. 6 A district judge will make a de novo determination of those portions objected to and may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge’s determination. 8 || The judge need not conduct a new hearing or hear arguments and may consider the 9|| magistrate judge’s record and make an independent determination thereon. The 10|| judge may, but is not required to, accept or consider additional evidence, or may 11]| recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions. United States v. Howell, 231 F.3d 615, 621 (9th Cir. 2000); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C); FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); LMJR 2(c), Local Magistrate Judge Rules for the Eastern District of Washington. A magistrate judge’s recommendation cannot be appealed to a court of appeals; only the district judge’s order or judgment can be appealed. 16 The Clerk of the Court is directed to file this Report and Recommendation 17|| and provide a copy to Plaintiff. 18 DATED September 29, 2020.

JOHNT. RODGERS 21 [” UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28