Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rice v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Rice v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

204 So. 3d 163, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17386
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 21, 2016
DocketNo. 1D16-2774
StatusPublished

This text of 204 So. 3d 163 (Rice v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rice v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., 204 So. 3d 163, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17386 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.'

DISMISSED. Jensen v. Whetstine, 985 So.2d 1218, 1220 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (“An order is not an appealable partial final order where there is a factual overlap between the pending claims and the claims resolved by the order.”).

B.L. THOMAS, BILBREY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jensen v. Whetstine
985 So. 2d 1218 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 So. 3d 163, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rice-v-jp-morgan-chase-bank-na-fladistctapp-2016.