Rice v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

204 So. 3d 163, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17386
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 21, 2016·No. No. 1D16-2774·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.'

DISMISSED. Jensen v. Whetstine, 985 So.2d 1218, 1220 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (“An order is not an appealable partial final order where there is a factual overlap between the pending claims and the claims resolved by the order.”).

B.L. THOMAS, BILBREY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rice v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., 204 So. 3d 163, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17386 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

204 So. 3d 163 (Rice v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jensen v. Whetstine
985 So. 2d 1218 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)