Rice v. J. F. Rasbury & Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Rice v. J. F. Rasbury & Co.

41 Tex. 421

DecidedJuly 1, 1874

StatusPublished

This text of 41 Tex. 421 (Rice v. J. F. Rasbury & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rice v. J. F. Rasbury & Co., 41 Tex. 421 (Tex. 1874).

Pincite

Opinion

Gould, Associate Justice.

This cause was removed from a justice’s court by certiorari to the District Court, from which it has been brought to this court by appeal.

In accordance with the provisions of the statute and former decisions the motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction is sustained. (Pas. Dig., arts. 6349-6353; Nich[422]*422ols v. Page, 34 Tex., 333; Peterson v. Johnson, 87 Tex., 436; Robertson & Beck v. Lackey, 36 Tex., 154.)

Dismissed.

Justice Moore, dissenting.

[Chief Justice Roberts did not sit in this case.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gould, Associate Justice.

This cause was removed from a justice’s court by certiorari to the District Court, from which it has been brought to this court by appeal.

In accordance with the provisions of the statute and former decisions the motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction is sustained. (Pas. Dig., arts. 6349-6353; Nich[422]*422ols v. Page, 34 Tex., 333; Peterson v. Johnson, 87 Tex., 436; Robertson & Beck v. Lackey, 36 Tex., 154.)

Dismissed.

Justice Moore, dissenting.

[Chief Justice Roberts did not sit in this case.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 Tex. 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rice-v-j-f-rasbury-co-tex-1874.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack