Rice v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.

88 Ohio St. (N.S.) 567

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 13, 1913·No. No. 13190·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed on ground that verdict for original defendant should have been directed.

Shauck, C. J., Johnson, Donahue, Newman and Wilkin, JJ., concur. Wanamaker, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rice v. Hocking Valley Railway Co., 88 Ohio St. (N.S.) 567 (Ohio 1913).

Pincite

88 Ohio St. (N.S.) 567 (Rice v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.