Rice v. Haines

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rice v. Haines

111 So. 3d 305, 2013 WL 1777155, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 6794

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 26, 2013

DocketNo. 5D13-1218

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 111 So. 3d 305 (Rice v. Haines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rice v. Haines, 111 So. 3d 305, 2013 WL 1777155, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 6794 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR STAY

PER CURIAM.

The Petitioner has filed an Emergency Motion to Stay Issuance and Service of Subpoenas pending review in this case, arguing that a denial of a stay will cause irreparable harm in the form of disclosure [306]*306of the very things which are the subject of the pending petition. The Respondents do not object and this court agrees.

STAY GRANTED, pending the disposition of Petition.

LAWSON, COHEN and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI