Rice v. Haines
111 So. 3d 305, 2013 WL 1777155, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 6794
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 26, 2013·No. No. 5D13-1218·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
ON MOTION FOR STAY
The Petitioner has filed an Emergency Motion to Stay Issuance and Service of Subpoenas pending review in this case, arguing that a denial of a stay will cause irreparable harm in the form of disclosure [306] of the very things which are the subject of the pending petition. The Respondents do not object and this court agrees.
STAY GRANTED, pending the disposition of Petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rice v. Haines, 111 So. 3d 305, 2013 WL 1777155, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 6794 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).
111 So. 3d 305 (Rice v. Haines) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. v. LISA S. DULBERG DE MORALES
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2020