Rice v. Fore

Supreme Court of Florida

Rice v. Fore

123 So. 858, 98 Fla. 507, 1929 Fla. LEXIS 1241

DecidedSeptember 27, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 123 So. 858 (Rice v. Fore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rice v. Fore, 123 So. 858, 98 Fla. 507, 1929 Fla. LEXIS 1241 (Fla. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a suit for specific performance brought by the assignee of a half interest of the vendee joined by the administrator of the vendee’s estate, the defendant being the vendor in the' contract to sell real estate. An appeal was taken from a decree dismissing the bill on demurrer sustained.

The cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed for lack of proper parties complainant. See 36 Cyc. 764; 20 Enc. Pl. & Pr. 422; Pomeroy’s Specific Performance (3rd Ed.) Section 488.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and. Buford, J. J., concur. Terrell. C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is a suit for specific performance brought by the assignee of a half interest of the vendee joined by the administrator of the vendee’s estate, the defendant being the vendor in the' contract to sell real estate. An appeal was taken from a decree dismissing the bill on demurrer sustained.

The cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed for lack of proper parties complainant. See 36 Cyc. 764; 20 Enc. Pl. & Pr. 422; Pomeroy’s Specific Performance (3rd Ed.) Section 488.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and. Buford, J. J., concur. Terrell. C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 So. 858, 98 Fla. 507, 1929 Fla. LEXIS 1241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rice-v-fore-fla-1929.