Rice v. Fairfield County Sheriff's Department

Fourth Circuit

Rice v. Fairfield County Sheriff's Department

444 F. App'x 667

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 29, 2011·No. No. 11-1495·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Rice appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rice v. Fairfield Cnty. Sheriff’s Dep’t, No. 0:11-cv-00310-JFA (D.S.C. Apr. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before [668]*668the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Rice appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rice v. Fairfield Cnty. Sheriff’s Dep’t, No. 0:11-cv-00310-JFA (D.S.C. Apr. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before [668]*668the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Rice v. Fairfield County Sheriff's Department, 444 F. App'x 667 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

444 F. App'x 667 (Rice v. Fairfield County Sheriff's Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related