Rice v. Elmhurst Contracting Co.
This text of 272 A.D.2d 925 (Rice v. Elmhurst Contracting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action on an executory contract providing for the employment of plaintiff “for a period of not more than two years on a weeldy basis” to recover salary claimed for the unexpired period after plaintiff’s discharge, less the amount received in other employment during the period. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment, entered after trial by the court without a jury, insofar as it dismisses the complaint for damages for breach of the contract, and from the entire judgment upon the ground that the amount awarded to the plaintiff is insufficient. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Hagarty, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.; Carswell, J., not voting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
272 A.D.2d 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rice-v-elmhurst-contracting-co-nyappdiv-1947.