Rice v. District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Illinois

Seventh Circuit

Rice v. District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Illinois

93 F.2d 1013, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 2984

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

DecidedOctober 16, 1937

DocketNo. 6409

StatusPublished

This text of 93 F.2d 1013 (Rice v. District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Illinois) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rice v. District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Illinois, 93 F.2d 1013, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 2984 (7th Cir. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A petition having been filed by George Rice and Progressive Miners of America et al. for a writ of prohibition to restrain The District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Illinois and Hon. Fred L. Wham, Judge of said District Court, from enforcing the order of said, court entered on October 18, 1937, and from entering any order in cause No. Equity 4655, United Electric Company, Plaintiff, v. George Rice and Progressive Miners of America et al., Defendants, and counsel for respondents to said petition having filed suggestions in opposition thereto, it is ordered by the court that the relief sought in said petition for a writ of prohibition be, and it -is hereby, denied, and that the said petition be, and it is hereby, dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

A petition having been filed by George Rice and Progressive Miners of America et al. for a writ of prohibition to restrain The District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Illinois and Hon. Fred L. Wham, Judge of said District Court, from enforcing the order of said, court entered on October 18, 1937, and from entering any order in cause No. Equity 4655, United Electric Company, Plaintiff, v. George Rice and Progressive Miners of America et al., Defendants, and counsel for respondents to said petition having filed suggestions in opposition thereto, it is ordered by the court that the relief sought in said petition for a writ of prohibition be, and it -is hereby, denied, and that the said petition be, and it is hereby, dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 F.2d 1013, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 2984, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rice-v-district-court-of-the-united-states-for-the-eastern-district-of-ca7-1937.