Rice v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CASE NO. 1:22-CV-00012-FDW JOHN RICE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER ) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) Acting Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) )
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Consent Motion for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, filed on June 1, 2023. (Doc. No. 13). Pursuant to the power of this Court to award fees to a prevailing party other than the United States incurred by that party in a civil action against the United States, including proceedings for judicial review of agency action, under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and in light of this Court’s March 7, 2023, Judgment remanding this case to Defendant Acting Commissioner for further administrative proceedings, and upon the consent of the parties, the parties’ Consent Motion for Attorney Fees, (Doc. No. 13), is GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Defendant pay $3,150.00 in attorney fees in full satisfaction of any and all claims Plaintiff may have in this case under the EAJA. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be paid $423.15 in costs from the Judgment Fund by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(a)(1). Pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010), these attorney fees are payable to Plaintiff as the prevailing party and are subject to offset through the Treasury Department’s Offset Program to satisfy any preexisting debt Plaintiff may owe to the United States Government. If, subsequent to the entry of this Order, the Commissioner determines that Plaintiff owes no debt to the United States that would subject this award of attorney’s fees to offset, the Commissioner may honor Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees providing for payment of the subject fees to Plaintiff's counsel, rather than to Plaintiff. If, however, Plaintiff is discovered to owe the Government any debt subject to offset, the Commissioner shall pay any attorney fees remaining after such offset to Plaintiff rather than to counsel. Should this occur, any remaining fees made payable to Plaintiff shall be sent to her counsel. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: June 5, 2023
Frank D. Whitney é United States District Judge Ags
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rice v. Commissioner of Social Security (Rice v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.