Rice v. Cochran
This text of 134 So. 2d 12 (Rice v. Cochran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This matter recurs on the petition for habeas corpus, the writ, the return of respondent, and the supplemental comment of petitioner. Upon further consideration we are of the opinion that the petitioner is not unlawfully detained. His contention that he was unlawfully deprived of the right of counsel is disposed of adversely to him by former decisions of this court. See Johnson v. Mayo, 158 Fla. 264, 28 So.2d 858, Carnley v. Cochran, Fla., 123 So.2d 249, and Jones v. Cochran, Fla., 125 So.2d 99.
Accordingly, the writ of habeas corpus heretofore issued is quashed, the cause dismissed, and the petitioner remanded to the custody of the respondent.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
134 So. 2d 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rice-v-cochran-fla-1961.