Rice v. Clear Spring Coal Co.

40 A. 149, 186 Pa. 49, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 958
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 9, 1898·No. Appeal, No. 488·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We find no error in the judgment from which this appeal was taken. The learned judge of the common pleas Avas clearly right in dismissing exceptions to the referee’s report, and in directing judgment to be entered for the defendant. For reasons briefly given in his opinion the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rice v. Clear Spring Coal Co., 40 A. 149, 186 Pa. 49, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 958 (Pa. 1898).

40 A. 149 (Rice v. Clear Spring Coal Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Taylor v. Gross
171 A.2d 613 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1961)
Fleck v. Universal-Cyclops Steel Corp.
156 A.2d 832 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1959)
Brookbank v. Benedum-Trees Oil Co.
131 A.2d 103 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1957)
Obringer v. Minnotte Brothers Co.
42 A.2d 413 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1945)
Obringer v. Minnotte Bros.
52 Pa. D. & C. 454 (Alleghany County Court of Common Pleas, 1944)
MacDonald v. United States
119 F.2d 821 (Ninth Circuit, 1941)
Marland v. Gillespie
1934 OK 158 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1934)
Rio Bravo Oil Co. v. Weed
50 S.W.2d 1080 (Texas Supreme Court, 1932)
Quinn v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.
239 N.W. 376 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1931)
Roxana Petroleum Corp. v. Jarvis
273 P. 661 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1929)
Westside Electric Street Ry. Co. v. West Penn Power Co.
8 Pa. D. & C. 281 (Washington County Court of Common Pleas, 1926)
Saccone v. West End Trust Co.
73 A. 971 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1909)