Rice v. Cayetano

208 F.3d 1102, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 3569, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2648, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 6188, 2000 WL 348818
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rice v. Cayetano. Read the opinion of the Court — 146 F.3d 1075
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 5, 2000·No. No. 97-16095·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Pursuant to the mandate of the United States Supreme Court certified on March 14, 2000, in Rice v. Cayetano, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 1044, 145 L.Ed.2d 1007, we vacated our opinion at 146 F.3d 1075 (9th Cir.1998), reverse the district court, and remand for further proceedings which are consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rice v. Cayetano, 208 F.3d 1102, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 3569, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2648, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 6188, 2000 WL 348818 (9th Cir. 2000).

208 F.3d 1102 (Rice v. Cayetano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rice v. Cayetano
528 U.S. 495 (Supreme Court, 2000)
Rice v. Cayetano
146 F.3d 1075 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)