Rice v. Bradford

63 N.E. 7, 180 Mass. 545, 1902 Mass. LEXIS 1135
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedFebruary 28, 1902
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 63 N.E. 7 (Rice v. Bradford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rice v. Bradford, 63 N.E. 7, 180 Mass. 545, 1902 Mass. LEXIS 1135 (Mass. 1902).

Opinion

Knowlton, J.

The testatrix left a will by which she gave a legacy to “ the President and trustees of Bowdoin College, in the State of Maine ... to form a memorial fund . . ., the income of which may be expended for the college uses as the trustees may decide.” The question before us is whether this legacy is exempt from taxation under the St. 1891, c. 425, § 1, which exempts legacies “ to or for charitable, educational or religious societies or institutions, the property of which is exempt by law from taxation,” Bowdoin College is an educational and charitable institution. But this exemption is confined to societies or institutions whose property is exempt from taxation by the laws of this Commonwealth. Minot v. Winthrop, 162 Mass. 113, 126. The appellant rests his argument upon the fact that Maine was once a part of Massachusetts and that this college was established by an act of the Legislature of this Commonwealth, namely, by the St. 1794, c. 16. But there is nothing in this statute which exempts the property of the college from taxation.

■ Maine became á separate and independent State under the St. 1819, c. 36. The property of Bowdoin College is not exempt from taxation under this statute. In the seventh of the terms and conditions expressed in the statute, it is provided that the “ president and trustees, and the overseers of said college, shall have, hold and enjoy their powers and privileges in all respects,” 'etc. They had no powers and privileges which exempted the general property of the college from taxation. There is also a [547]*547provision in this statute that “all lands heretofore granted by this Commonwealth to any religious, literary, or eleemosynary corporation or society, shall be free from taxation, while the same continues to be owned by such corporation or society.” This is not a general exemption from taxation such as is referred to in the St. 1891, c. 425, § 1. It implies that the general property of such corporations and societies was not exempt from taxation under any continuing statute, and this was the fact. Then and for many years the Legislature of Massachusetts had been accustomed to pass an annual tax act prescribing taxation throughout the Commonwealth and exempting the property of Bowdoin College and other similar educational institutions. Each of these acts was to be in effect for a year only, and this corporation was subject to taxation upon its general property in use immediately after the formation of the State of Maine, except as the new State, by its legislation, exempted it. At no time since then has this college been exempt from taxation under any law of Massachusetts. It follows that it is not within the exemption relied on by the appellant.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Animal Rescue League v. Assessors of Bourne
37 N.E.2d 1019 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1941)
Batt v. Treasurer & Receiver General
95 N.E. 784 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1911)
Davis v. Treasurer & Receiver General
94 N.E. 556 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 N.E. 7, 180 Mass. 545, 1902 Mass. LEXIS 1135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rice-v-bradford-mass-1902.