Rice v. Blanks

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 6, 2005
Docket05-7144
StatusUnpublished

This text of Rice v. Blanks (Rice v. Blanks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rice v. Blanks, (4th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7144

BRIHEIM LAFEE RICE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

J. BLANKS, Sergeant/Security; B. HINES- COLLINS, Sergeant/Security,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-05-599)

Submitted: November 22, 2005 Decided: December 6, 2005

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Briheim Lafee Rice, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Briheim Lafee Rice appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint, denying

his petition for preliminary injunction, and denying his motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Rice v. Blanks, No. CA-05-599 (E.D. Va.

June 21, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rice v. Blanks, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rice-v-blanks-ca4-2005.