Rice v. Blanks
This text of Rice v. Blanks (Rice v. Blanks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7144
BRIHEIM LAFEE RICE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
J. BLANKS, Sergeant/Security; B. HINES- COLLINS, Sergeant/Security,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-05-599)
Submitted: November 22, 2005 Decided: December 6, 2005
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Briheim Lafee Rice, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Briheim Lafee Rice appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint, denying
his petition for preliminary injunction, and denying his motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Rice v. Blanks, No. CA-05-599 (E.D. Va.
June 21, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rice v. Blanks, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rice-v-blanks-ca4-2005.