Rice v. Benedict

18 Mich. 75, 1869 Mich. LEXIS 84
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 11, 1869·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Guricm.

In this case, the suit haying been referred under the statute, and the report of the referees haying been excepted to, the Circuit Court instead of confirming it in whole or in part, set it aside altogether, and then without any further trial or reference back, gaye judgment for plaintiffs for $646.32 damages, with costs.

This was unauthorized by law. As soon as the report was set aside, the case stood in the same predicament as if the verdict of a jury had been vacated, and until a' new trial should- be had before the Court or a jury or referees, there was nothing left to act upon. A report set aside leaves the cause as if it had never been tried, and there is left neither evidence nor finding; but merely an issue of fact requiring trial before any judgment can be given. Until some competent body has re-tried that issue, the court cannot have any basis for determining which party should prevail, or what amount, if any, was due from one to the other. Every judgment must be based upon some finding, and here there is none whatever remaining in force. The judgment must be reversed, and the cause be remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rice v. Benedict, 18 Mich. 75, 1869 Mich. LEXIS 84 (Mich. 1869).

18 Mich. 75 (Rice v. Benedict) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Detroit Club Holdings LLC v. Jay Edward
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2019
James v. Coleman
1917 OK 324 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1917)
Burchett, Sheriff v. Hamil
1897 OK 9 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1897)
Hopkins v. Sanford
2 N.W. 39 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1879)