Rice v. Bankers Trust Co.

83 Misc. 2d 797, 374 N.Y.S.2d 87, 1975 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2984
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 3, 1975
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 83 Misc. 2d 797 (Rice v. Bankers Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rice v. Bankers Trust Co., 83 Misc. 2d 797, 374 N.Y.S.2d 87, 1975 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2984 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1975).

Opinion

Abraham J. Multer, J.

Motion to fix and determine the amount of the lien of Underwriters Adjusting Company.

This negligence action, after two trials and an appeal, resulted in collection by plaintiff of an award of $80,000.

Respondent claimed a workmen’s compensation law lien, which its counsel and plaintiff’s counsel agree is the sum of $9,563.82.

All parties were given the opportunity for a hearing for the submission of any proof available. The court has now been requested to determine the motion on the court record.

The allowance to plaintiff’s counsel for fees and disbursements has heretofore been fixed by this court’s order (Hirsch, J.) at a sum equal to 40% of the recovery. No question is raised as to the amount thereof.

The sole question for determination on this motion is whether or not the lienor’s share of recovery should be charged with its equitable share of the attorneys’ fees and disbursements.

The reasoning of this court at Trial Term in Matter of Koutrakos v Long Is. Coll. Hosp. (78 Misc 2d 39), even though rejected by the Appellate Division of this department (47 AD2d 500), is now made the law of this State effective June 10, 1975, prior to the making of this motion (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 29, as amd by L 1975, ch 190).

The lien is charged with 40% thereof, to wit, the sum of $3,825.52 which shall be paid to plaintiff’s attorneys and plaintiff given credit therefor accordingly, and the balance of $5,738.30 paid to respondent Underwriters Adjusting Company in full satisfaction of its lien asserted herein.

This is the order of the court made on all the papers, pleadings, and proceedings had herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'CONNOR v. Lee-Hy Paving Corp.
480 F. Supp. 716 (E.D. New York, 1979)
Cohen v. Grant
87 Misc. 2d 780 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1976)
Cardillo v. Long Island College Hospital
86 Misc. 438 (New York Supreme Court, 1976)
Wargo v. Longo
85 Misc. 2d 898 (New York Supreme Court, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 Misc. 2d 797, 374 N.Y.S.2d 87, 1975 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2984, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rice-v-bankers-trust-co-nysupct-1975.