Rice v. Asheville Ice Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Rice v. Asheville Ice Co.

204 N.C. 768

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedJune 14, 1933

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 204 N.C. 768 (Rice v. Asheville Ice Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rice v. Asheville Ice Co., 204 N.C. 768 (N.C. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

The judgment in this action is affirmed on the authority of Lewis v. Archbell, 199 N. C., 205, 154 S. E., 11.

It does not appear from the complaint that plaintiff has suffered damages caused by any unlawful act of either of the defendants. The plaintiff is not a competitor or rival in business of either of the defendants. For this reason subsection 3 of section 2563 of the Consolidated Statutes of North Carolina, is not applicable to the facts alleged in the complaint.

The demurrer was properly sustained. The judgment dismissing the action, is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cubiam.

The judgment in this action is affirmed on the authority of Lewis v. Archbell, 199 N. C., 205, 154 S. E., 11.

It does not appear from the complaint that plaintiff has suffered damages caused by any unlawful act of either of the defendants. The plaintiff is not a competitor or rival in business of either of the defendants. For this reason subsection 3 of section 2563 of the Consolidated Statutes of North Carolina, is not applicable to the facts alleged in the complaint.

The demurrer was properly sustained. The judgment dismissing the action, is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 N.C. 768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rice-v-asheville-ice-co-nc-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack