Rice v. Asheville Ice Co.

204 N.C. 768
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 14, 1933·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

The judgment in this action is affirmed on the authority of Lewis v. Archbell, 199 N. C., 205, 154 S. E., 11.

It does not appear from the complaint that plaintiff has suffered damages caused by any unlawful act of either of the defendants. The plaintiff is not a competitor or rival in business of either of the defendants. For this reason subsection 3 of section 2563 of the Consolidated Statutes of North Carolina, is not applicable to the facts alleged in the complaint.

The demurrer was properly sustained. The judgment dismissing the action, is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rice v. Asheville Ice Co., 204 N.C. 768 (N.C. 1933).

204 N.C. 768 (Rice v. Asheville Ice Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lineberger v. . Ice Co.
17 S.E.2d 502 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1941)
Lineberger v. Colonial Ice Co.
17 S.E.2d 502 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1941)