Rice v. American National Red Cross

District Court, E.D. California·Decided September 17, 2024·No. 2:23-cv-01333·Unknown

Opinion

REGINALD RICE, No. 2:23-cv-1333-MCE-CSK Plaintiff, ORDER v. (ECF Nos. 17, 29.) Defendant. On June 14, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 29), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 29) are ADOPTED in full; 2. Plaintiff’s counsel is ORDERED to pay Defendant $1,000 as reasonable expenses for attorney’s fees incurred in bringing the motion for terminating sanctions; 3. Defendant’s motion for terminating sanctions (ECF No. 17) is GRANTED; and 4. The complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety without prejudice, and the case closed. Dated: September 16, 2024 Mata LE rlASX ° SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rice v. American National Red Cross, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Rice v. American National Red Cross (Rice v. American National Red Cross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Donald Milton Orand v. United States
602 F.2d 207 (Ninth Circuit, 1979)