Rice Stix Dry Goods Co. v. Lee

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Rice Stix Dry Goods Co. v. Lee

1916 OK 643, 158 P. 444, 59 Okla. 91, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 1117

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 6, 1916

Docket7503

StatusPublished

This text of 1916 OK 643 (Rice Stix Dry Goods Co. v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rice Stix Dry Goods Co. v. Lee, 1916 OK 643, 158 P. 444, 59 Okla. 91, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 1117 (Okla. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

*92 Opinion by

RITTENHOUSE, C.

The plaintiff in error filed a well-prepared brief in this cause, no brief has been filed by defendants in error, nor any further extension of time in which to file brief asked, nor any excuse given as to why a brief has not been filed; and, as the errors assigned seem to' be supported by the record, this cause is reversed and remanded.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*92 Opinion by

RITTENHOUSE, C.

The plaintiff in error filed a well-prepared brief in this cause, no brief has been filed by defendants in error, nor any further extension of time in which to file brief asked, nor any excuse given as to why a brief has not been filed; and, as the errors assigned seem to' be supported by the record, this cause is reversed and remanded.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1916 OK 643, 158 P. 444, 59 Okla. 91, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 1117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rice-stix-dry-goods-co-v-lee-okla-1916.