Rice, James v. VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER

2025 TN WC 22
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedApril 28, 2025
Docket2021-06-0660
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 TN WC 22 (Rice, James v. VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rice, James v. VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, 2025 TN WC 22 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2025).

Opinion

FILED Apr 28, 2025 11:40 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT NASHVILLE

JAMES RICE, ) Docket No. 2021-06-0660 Employee, ) v. ) ) State File No. 36971-2019 VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY ) MEDICAL CENTER, ) Employer. ) Judge Joshua D. Baker

COMPENSATION ORDER

At an April 24, 2025 compensation hearing, the parties agreed on this claim’s facts and applicable law but not on a remedy. In his testimony, Mr. Rice suggested a $200,000 award of permanent partial disability benefits as fair compensation.

Yet, the remedy here is limited by a statute, requiring application of a specific formula. Because the Court cannot deviate from that, Mr. Rice is awarded 12% permanent partial disability benefits and future lifetime medical benefits for any reasonable and medically necessary treatment for his workplace injury with Drs. Byron Stephens and Donald Lee.

History of Claim

In this accepted claim, Mr. Rice injured his neck and left arm when lifting and tossing a heavy bag of trash while working for Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Vanderbilt authorized treatment with two panel physicians, Dr. Byron Stephens and Dr. Donald Lee, who surgically repaired Mr. Rice’s injuries.

The authorized physicians’ combined impairment ratings totaled 3% whole-body impairment. Mr. Rice received a 2% impairment rating from Dr. Lee for his elbow injury, and Dr. Stephens assigned a 1% impairment rating for his neck injury.

1 However, the parties’ own experts both assessed markedly increased impairment ratings for the neck injury. Dr. Robert Landsberg, who was Mr. Rice’s expert, assessed a 15% whole-body impairment, apportioning 12% for the neck injury and 3% for the left elbow. Vanderbilt’s expert, Dr. Tarek Elalayli, assigned a 7% impairment rating for the neck injury without rating the elbow.

Given the disparity in ratings, the parties used the Medical Impairment Rating (MIR) Registry. The MIR Registry physician, Dr. Jeffrey Hazlewood, assigned Mr. Rice an 11% impairment rating for his neck and a 1% impairment rating for his elbow, totaling 12% whole-body impairment.

Among other things, the parties agreed to the admissibility of the doctors’ reports, that Mr. Rice returned to work at Vanderbilt making the same or greater pay, that his compensation rate is $407.44, and that Vanderbilt overpaid temporary total disability benefits by $1,178.75.

In his testimony, Mr. Rice explained what he has lost and suggested a $200,000 award as fair compensation. He testified his injuries have permanently altered his ability to perform daily activities and that pain often disrupts his sleep. Although Vanderbilt accommodated his permanent restrictions, he fears reinjury given his decreased functional ability.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Mr. Rice must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he is entitled to the requested benefits. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(6) (2024). He seeks permanent partial disability benefits and future medical treatment.

An award of permanent partial disability “shall be determined by multiplying the employee's impairment rating by four hundred fifty (450) weeks[,]” which is called an “original award.” Id. at -207(3)(A) (Emphasis added). Notably, when “a statute's language is expressed in a manner devoid of ambiguity, courts are not at liberty to depart from the statute's words.” Freeman v. Marco Transp. Co., 27 S.W.3d 909, 911 (Tenn. 2000).

Even though Mr. Rice believes application of the statute’s formula yields an unfair result, the Court is “not at liberty to depart” from the statute and must apply the formula as directed to calculate his original award of permanent partial disability benefits.

Further, Dr. Hazlewood’s impairment rating as the Registry physician is presumed accurate unless rebutted by clear and convincing evidence, meaning “if no evidence . . . raises a serious and substantial doubt about the evaluation’s correctness, [then] the MIRR evaluation is the accurate impairment rating.” Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone North

2 American Tire, 417 S.W.3d 393, 411 (Tenn. 2013). Without any evidence casting “serious and substantial doubt” on Dr. Hazlewood’s opinion, the Court must presume his impairment rating is accurate. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-204(d)(4).

The Court finds Mr. Rice sustained 12% impairment and calculates his original award for permanent partial disability benefits as 12% times 450 weeks times the stipulated compensation rate of $407.44, or $22,001.76. After deducting Vanderbilt’s credit for overpayment of temporary disability benefits, the Court awards Mr. Rice $20,823.01.

As for medical benefits, an employer must furnish medical treatment made reasonably necessary by the work accident. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-204(a)(1)(A). So, Vanderbilt must provide reasonable and necessary treatment with Drs. Stephens and Lee.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. Vanderbilt shall pay Mr. Rice permanent partial disability benefits of $20,823.01 under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-207(3)(A). 2. Vanderbilt shall pay reasonable and necessary future medical expenses with Drs. Stephens and Lee under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-204(a)(1)(A). 3. Mr. Rice is entitled to reimbursement of reasonable costs under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(c)(8) and Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 54.04. His attorney may file a motion requesting them.

4. Mr. Rice’s attorney, Jill Draughon, is awarded an attorney’s fee of $4,164.60, or 20% of the total award. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-226(a)(1).

5. Vanderbilt shall pay the $150.00 filing fee to the Clerk within five business days after this order becomes final under Tennessee Compilation Rules and Regulations 0800-02-21-.06 (December, 2023).

6. Unless appealed, this order shall become final in 30 days. 7. Vanderbilt shall file Form SD-2 with the Court Clerk within ten business days of this order becoming final.

ENTERED April 28, 2025.

_______________________________ Judge Joshua D. Baker Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

3 APPENDIX

Exhibits:

1. Medical records (TNComp Document ID 132702) 2. Medical reports (TNComp Document ID 132701)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of this Order was sent as shown on April 28, 2025.

Name Certified Email Service Sent To: Mail Jill Draughon, X jdraughon@hughesandcoleman.com Employee’s attorney sconner@hughesandcoleman.com Nate Cherry, X ncherry@tatewilsonlaw.com Employer’s Attorney

_____________________________________ Penny Shrum, Court Clerk Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov

4 Right to Appeal: If you disagree with the Court’s Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. To do so, you must: 1. Complete the enclosed form entitled “Notice of Appeal” and file it with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims before the expiration of the deadline.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

William H. Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone North American Tire, LLC
417 S.W.3d 393 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 2013)
Freeman v. Marco Transportation Co.
27 S.W.3d 909 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 TN WC 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rice-james-v-vanderbilt-university-medical-center-tennworkcompcl-2025.