Rice & Hutchins Atlanta Co. v. Griffin
This text of 104 S.E. 634 (Rice & Hutchins Atlanta Co. v. Griffin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The rulings on the admissibility of evidence show no cause for reversal. On conflicting' evidence the judge did not err in his judgment granting in part, and refusing in part, the temporary injunction as prayed.
Judgment affirmed on both the main and the cross-bill of exceptions.
cited, on width of entrance: Turner v. Thompson, 58 Ga. 268 (24 Am. R. 497), s. c. 69 Ga. 219; Jemo v. Tourist Hotel Co., 55 Wash. 595; Lindbloom v. Berkman, 43 Wash. 356 (86 Pac. 567); Kitchen Hotel Co. v. Philbin, 2 Neb. Unoff. 340 (96 N. W. 487); Walker v. Clifford, 128 Ala. 67 (29 So. 588); Ward v. Robertson, 77 Iowa, 159 (41 N. W. 603); Cummings v. Perry, 177 Mass. 407 (58 N. E. 1083); Agate v. Lowenbein, 4 Daly (N. Y.), 62; Vidvard v. Cushman, 23 Hun (N. Y.), 434; Oakford v. Nixon, 177 Pa. 76 (35 Atl. 588). On signs at entrance: Salinger v. North American Woolen Mills, 70 W. Va. 151 (73 S. E. 312); Booth v. Gaither, 58 Ill. App. 263; McNair v. Ames, 68 Atl. 950 ; Lawrence v. Springer, 49 N. J. Eq. 289 (24 Atl. 933); Crosdale v. Lanigan, 129 N. Y. 604 (29 N. E. 824, 26 Am. St. R. 551); Johnson v. Stillman, 29 Minn. 95 (43 N. W. 192); Cronkhite v. Cronkhite, 94 N. Y. 323; Baker v. L. & N. R. Co., 65 Miss. 172; St. Louis Stock Yards v. Wiggins, 112 Ill. 384; Tanner v. Valentine, 75 Ill. 625; Collins v. Macey, 25 Conn. 239; Wilson v. St. Paul &c. Ry. Co., 41 Minn. 56 (42 N. W. 600, 4 L. R. A. 378); Houston v. Laffee, 46 N. H. 505; Dunneen v. Rich, 22 Wis. 524; Simpson v. Wright, 21 Ill. App. 67; Brown v. [609]*609Woodworth, 5 Barb. 550; Kivett v. McKeithen, 90 N C. 106; Hitchens v. Shaller, 32 Mich. 496; Owen v. Field, 12 Allen, 457; Jones, Land. & Ten. § 40. On glass partitions, and light on stairway: Smyth v. Nelson, 135 Ga. 96; Holden v. Tidwell, 37 Okla. 553 (133 Pac. 54); 16 R. C. L. 709, 716, and cit.
cited: DeFoor v. Stephens, 133 Ga. 617; Darnell v. Columbus &c. Co., 129 Ga. 62; Asa G. Candler Inc. v. Ga. Theater Co., 148 Ga. 188, and cit.; 24 Cyc. 1045, 1046; Lidgerding v. Zignego, 77 Minn. 421 (80 N. W. 360); Edmison v. Lowry, 17 L. R. A. 275; Case v. Minot, 22 L. R. A. 536; Tremont Theater Co. v. Bruno, 225 Mass. 461 (114 N. E. 672); Flanagan v. Welch, 220 Mass. 186 (107 N. E. 979); Rojas v. Seeger, 122 La. 218 (47 So. 532); Miller v. Fitzgerald Co., 62 Neb. 270 (86 N. W. 1078) ; Gans v. Hughes, 14 N. Y. Supp. 930; O’Neill v. Breese, 23 N. Y. Supp. 526; Vinissky v. Lazovsky, 155 Ill. App. 596; Riddle v. Littlefield, 53 N. H. 503; 9 R. C. L. 754, § 21, 763, § 27, and cit.; Note to German Saving &c. Co. v. Gordon, 26 L. R. A. (N. S.) 331; Kelly v. Dunning, 43 N. J. Eq. 62; Toothe v. Bryce, 50 N. J. Eq. 589; Curtiss v. Ayrault, 47 N. Y. 73; Morrison v. King, 62 Ill. 30; Powers v. Heffernan, 233 Ill. 597 (84 N. E. 661, 16 L. R. A. (N. S.) 523); National Bank v. Cunningham, 46 O. St. 575; Civil Code, § 4628.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
104 S.E. 634, 150 Ga. 607, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rice-hutchins-atlanta-co-v-griffin-ga-1920.