RICE, CATHERINE v. MILLS, MICHAEL E.
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
494 CAF 12-00597 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
IN THE MATTER OF CATHERINE RICE, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
V ORDER
MICHAEL E. MILLS, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
DAVIS LAW OFFICE PLLC, OSWEGO (STEPHANIE N. DAVIS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
AMDURSKY, PELKY, FENNELL & WALLEN, P.C., OSWEGO (COURTNEY S. RADICK OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.
THEODORE W. STENUF, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, MINOA, FOR AUSTIN M.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oswego County (Kimberly M. Seager, J.), entered February 21, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, awarded petitioner unsupervised visitation with the subject child.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: April 26, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
RICE, CATHERINE v. MILLS, MICHAEL E. (RICE, CATHERINE v. MILLS, MICHAEL E.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.