Ricco v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ricco v. State

445 So. 2d 627, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11643

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 8, 1984

DocketNo. 82-2571

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 445 So. 2d 627 (Ricco v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ricco v. State, 445 So. 2d 627, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11643 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant’s conviction and sentence for manslaughter are affirmed on the authority of Dolan v. State, 85 So.2d 139 (Fla.1956). In reaching this decision, we have also concluded that the state’s use of the defendant’s grand jury testimony did not constitute fundamental error. Consequently, the various errors assigned to this point cannot be asserted on appeal due to the defendant’s failure to object properly at trial. See Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701 (Fla.1978).

ANSTEAD, C.J., and HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant’s conviction and sentence for manslaughter are affirmed on the authority of Dolan v. State, 85 So.2d 139 (Fla.1956). In reaching this decision, we have also concluded that the state’s use of the defendant’s grand jury testimony did not constitute fundamental error. Consequently, the various errors assigned to this point cannot be asserted on appeal due to the defendant’s failure to object properly at trial. See Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701 (Fla.1978).

ANSTEAD, C.J., and HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

445 So. 2d 627, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ricco-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack