Ricco v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ricco v. State

445 So. 2d 627, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11643

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 8, 1984·No. No. 82-2571·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant’s conviction and sentence for manslaughter are affirmed on the authority of Dolan v. State, 85 So.2d 139 (Fla.1956). In reaching this decision, we have also concluded that the state’s use of the defendant’s grand jury testimony did not constitute fundamental error. Consequently, the various errors assigned to this point cannot be asserted on appeal due to the defendant’s failure to object properly at trial. See Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701 (Fla.1978).

ANSTEAD, C.J., and HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant’s conviction and sentence for manslaughter are affirmed on the authority of Dolan v. State, 85 So.2d 139 (Fla.1956). In reaching this decision, we have also concluded that the state’s use of the defendant’s grand jury testimony did not constitute fundamental error. Consequently, the various errors assigned to this point cannot be asserted on appeal due to the defendant’s failure to object properly at trial. See Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701 (Fla.1978).

ANSTEAD, C.J., and HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Ricco v. State, 445 So. 2d 627, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11643 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

445 So. 2d 627 (Ricco v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related