Riccio v. Gold Coast Capital Corp.
521 So. 2d 308, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 619, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 863, 1988 WL 18586
Opinion
The record supports the trial court’s determination that the parties intended the Gold Coast Capital Corporation mortgage be superior to the Riccio purchase money second mortgage. We therefore affirm the Final Judgment. See Liza Danielle, Inc. v. Jamko, Inc., 408 So.2d 735 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); see also Tippett v. Frank, 238 So.2d 671 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Riccio v. Gold Coast Capital Corp., 521 So. 2d 308, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 619, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 863, 1988 WL 18586 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
521 So. 2d 308 (Riccio v. Gold Coast Capital Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Riccio v. Stein
559 So. 2d 1207 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)