Riccio v. Cairo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Riccio v. Cairo

207 A.D.2d 545, 616 N.Y.S.2d 255, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8531

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 29, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 207 A.D.2d 545 (Riccio v. Cairo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Riccio v. Cairo, 207 A.D.2d 545, 616 N.Y.S.2d 255, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8531 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding to invalidate a petition designating Richard J. Ahrens as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 13, 1994, for the nomination of the Conservative Party as its candidate for the public office of Member of the Assembly for the 14th Assembly District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robbins, J., on decision; McGinity, J., on judgment), dated August 22, 1994, which granted the petition.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The record on appeal supports the Supreme Court’s factual determination that the appellant was not a resident of the 14th Assembly District for the 12 months immediately preced[546]*546ing the election in which he sought to run (NY Const, art III, § 7; see, Matter of Carey v Foster, 164 AD2d 930). In view of this determination, we do not reach any of the other issues put forward by the parties. Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, Miller, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding to invalidate a petition designating Richard J. Ahrens as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 13, 1994, for the nomination of the Conservative Party as its candidate for the public office of Member of the Assembly for the 14th Assembly District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robbins, J., on decision; McGinity, J., on judgment), dated August 22, 1994, which granted the petition.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The record on appeal supports the Supreme Court’s factual determination that the appellant was not a resident of the 14th Assembly District for the 12 months immediately preced[546]*546ing the election in which he sought to run (NY Const, art III, § 7; see, Matter of Carey v Foster, 164 AD2d 930). In view of this determination, we do not reach any of the other issues put forward by the parties. Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, Miller, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 A.D.2d 545, 616 N.Y.S.2d 255, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riccio-v-cairo-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack