Ricciardi v. Ricciardi

559 A.2d 1193, 18 Conn. App. 826, 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 203
CourtConnecticut Appellate Court
DecidedJune 8, 1989
Docket7271
StatusPublished

This text of 559 A.2d 1193 (Ricciardi v. Ricciardi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ricciardi v. Ricciardi, 559 A.2d 1193, 18 Conn. App. 826, 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 203 (Colo. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to modify child support payments.

The defendant, as the appellant, has the burden of showing that there was error in the judgment from which the appeal was taken. Manzin v. United Bank & Trust Co., 6 Conn. App. 513, 517, 506 A.2d 169 (1986). We have carefully considered the defendant’s claims of error and, after affording those claims the appropriate scope of review, we find that the defendant has not met his burden.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Manzin v. United Bank & Trust Co.
506 A.2d 169 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
559 A.2d 1193, 18 Conn. App. 826, 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ricciardi-v-ricciardi-connappct-1989.