Ricciardi v. Ricciardi

559 A.2d 1193, 18 Conn. App. 826, 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 203
Connecticut Appellate Court·Decided June 8, 1989·No. 7271·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to modify child support payments.

The defendant, as the appellant, has the burden of showing that there was error in the judgment from which the appeal was taken. Manzin v. United Bank & Trust Co., 6 Conn. App. 513, 517, 506 A.2d 169 (1986). We have carefully considered the defendant’s claims of error and, after affording those claims the appropriate scope of review, we find that the defendant has not met his burden.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ricciardi v. Ricciardi, 559 A.2d 1193, 18 Conn. App. 826, 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 203 (Colo. Ct. App. 1989).

559 A.2d 1193 (Ricciardi v. Ricciardi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Manzin v. United Bank & Trust Co.
506 A.2d 169 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1986)