Ricci v. Superior Court of Alameda County

290 P. 519, 107 Cal. App. 756, 1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 512
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedJuly 26, 1930
DocketDocket No. 7481.
StatusPublished

This text of 290 P. 519 (Ricci v. Superior Court of Alameda County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ricci v. Superior Court of Alameda County, 290 P. 519, 107 Cal. App. 756, 1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 512 (Cal. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM CASE.
[1] Except a different minor is involved, the facts and the law of this application are the same as in Peter Ricci et al. v. Superior Court et al., Civil No. 7482, ante, p. 395 [290 P. 517], this day filed. For the reasons there stated the demurrer is sustained and the temporary writ is discharged.

Nourse, P.J., and Spence, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing in this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on August 23, 1930, and an application by petitioners to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on September 23, 1930. *Page 757

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ricci v. Superior Court
290 P. 517 (California Court of Appeal, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
290 P. 519, 107 Cal. App. 756, 1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ricci-v-superior-court-of-alameda-county-calctapp-1930.