Ricci v. Memorial Hospital

209 A.D.2d 786, 618 N.Y.S.2d 589, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10844
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 3, 1994·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

White, J.

Appeal from an order of Supreme Court (Kahn, J.), entered February 14, 1994 in Albany County, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs’ motion for a protective order.

Control of disclosure is within the sphere of the trial court’s broad discretionary power and, absent abuse, should not be disturbed (see, Dunlap v United Health Servs., 189 AD2d 1072; Soper v Wilkinson Match [USA], 176 AD2d 1025). Applying [787]*787this principle here, we affirm since we agree with Supreme Court that defendant did not establish the necessity for a second physical examination and, more particularly, a psychiatric examination of plaintiff Shirleen A. Ricci.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ricci v. Memorial Hospital, 209 A.D.2d 786, 618 N.Y.S.2d 589, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10844 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

209 A.D.2d 786 (Ricci v. Memorial Hospital) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harvey v. State
281 A.D.2d 846 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Besicorp Group, Inc. v. Enowitz
268 A.D.2d 846 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Geary v. Hunton & Williams
245 A.D.2d 936 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Santiago v. Pyramid Crossgates Co.
243 A.D.2d 955 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Washburn v. A.W. Lawrence & Co
222 A.D.2d 878 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)