Ricci v. Memorial Hospital
Opinion
Appeal from an order of Supreme Court (Kahn, J.), entered February 14, 1994 in Albany County, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs’ motion for a protective order.
Control of disclosure is within the sphere of the trial court’s broad discretionary power and, absent abuse, should not be disturbed (see, Dunlap v United Health Servs., 189 AD2d 1072; Soper v Wilkinson Match [USA], 176 AD2d 1025). Applying [787]*787this principle here, we affirm since we agree with Supreme Court that defendant did not establish the necessity for a second physical examination and, more particularly, a psychiatric examination of plaintiff Shirleen A. Ricci.
Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
209 A.D.2d 786 (Ricci v. Memorial Hospital) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.