Ricci v. Matthews

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Ricci v. Matthews

12 A.3d 287, 608 Pa. 422

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 12, 2011·No. 669 MAL 2010·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*423 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of JANUARY, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Does the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101, et seq., expressly grant County Commissioners in Second Class A Counties the right to exercise limited supervisory authority over employees of Row Offices for purposes of enforcing the Ethics Act’s remedial purposes?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*423 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of JANUARY, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Does the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101, et seq., expressly grant County Commissioners in Second Class A Counties the right to exercise limited supervisory authority over employees of Row Offices for purposes of enforcing the Ethics Act’s remedial purposes?

Ricci v. Matthews, 12 A.3d 287, 608 Pa. 422 (Pa. 2011).

Pincite

12 A.3d 287 (Ricci v. Matthews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related