Riccardi v. Otero

33 A.D.3d 571, 822 N.Y.S.2d 705
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 31, 2006·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (George D. Salerno, J.), entered October 3, 2005, which, inter alia, granted defendants’ motions to dismiss the action as abandoned pursuant to CPLR 3215 (c), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[572] While this one incident, failure to make the appropriate diary entry, constitutes law office failure, and excuses the failure to move for a default judgment within one year (CPLR 3215 [c]), we find, on a search of the record, that there is no showing of the action’s merit. Concur—Saxe, J.E, Sullivan, Williams, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Riccardi v. Otero, 33 A.D.3d 571, 822 N.Y.S.2d 705 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

33 A.D.3d 571 (Riccardi v. Otero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jacobson v. Val
2022 NY Slip Op 03891 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Gause v. 2405 Marion Corp.
2017 NY Slip Op 6998 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)