Ricardo Ybarra Zamora v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 30, 2005
Docket04-05-00096-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ricardo Ybarra Zamora v. State (Ricardo Ybarra Zamora v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ricardo Ybarra Zamora v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion


MEMORANDUM OPINION


No. 04-05-00096-CR


Ricardo Ybarra ZAMORA,

Appellant


v.


The STATE of Texas,

Appellee


From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 03-1872-CR

Honorable Sam Robertson, Judge Presiding


PER CURIAM

Sitting:            Alma L. López, Chief Justice

Catherine Stone, Justice

Sarah B. Duncan, Justice

Delivered and Filed:   March 30, 2005


DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

            Appellant was sentenced on June 21, 2004. No timely motion for new trial having been filed, appellant’s notice of appeal was due to be filed no later than July 21, 2004. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2. The notice of appeal was not filed until February 5, 2005, and no motion for extension of time was filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. This court lacks jurisdiction over an appeal of a criminal conviction in the absence of a timely, written notice of appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Shute v. State, 744 S.W.2d 96, 97 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988); see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991)(out-of-time appeal from final felony conviction may be sought by filing a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure). On February 17, 2005, this court ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant responded to our order on March 16, 2005; however, nothing contained in appellant’s response provides this court with any basis for exercising jurisdiction given that the notice of appeal was untimely filed. This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals
802 S.W.2d 241 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Shute v. State
744 S.W.2d 96 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1988)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ricardo Ybarra Zamora v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ricardo-ybarra-zamora-v-state-texapp-2005.