Ricardo Tati Santiesteban v. State
Opinion
NUMBER 13-20-00531-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
RICARDO TATI SANTIESTEBAN, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 25th District Court of Gonzales County, Texas.
ORDER Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Tijerina Order Per Curiam
Before the Court is appellant's motion for pro se access to the appellate record.
Appellant's counsel filed an Anders brief, and appellant has been unable to examine the
record in order to file a pro se brief.
Appellant’s motion is hereby GRANTED. Accordingly, the trial court is ORDERED
to ensure appellant has the opportunity to fully examine the appellate record on or before fifteen (15) days from the date this order issues, and it is FURTHER ORDERED the trial
court notify this Court as to the date upon which the appellate record was made available
to appellant. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).
Furthermore, Appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the day the appellate
record is first made available to him to file his pro se brief with this Court. The State shall
have twenty days thereafter to file its response, if any.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed on the 26th day of March, 2021.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ricardo Tati Santiesteban v. State (Ricardo Tati Santiesteban v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.