Ricardo Tati Santiesteban v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 26, 2021·No. 13-20-00531-CR·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-20-00531-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

RICARDO TATI SANTIESTEBAN, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 25th District Court of Gonzales County, Texas.

ORDER Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Tijerina Order Per Curiam

Before the Court is appellant's motion for pro se access to the appellate record.

Appellant's counsel filed an Anders brief, and appellant has been unable to examine the

record in order to file a pro se brief.

Appellant’s motion is hereby GRANTED. Accordingly, the trial court is ORDERED

to ensure appellant has the opportunity to fully examine the appellate record on or before fifteen (15) days from the date this order issues, and it is FURTHER ORDERED the trial

court notify this Court as to the date upon which the appellate record was made available

to appellant. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

Furthermore, Appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the day the appellate

record is first made available to him to file his pro se brief with this Court. The State shall

have twenty days thereafter to file its response, if any.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the 26th day of March, 2021.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ricardo Tati Santiesteban v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Ricardo Tati Santiesteban v. State (Ricardo Tati Santiesteban v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kelly, Sylvester
436 S.W.3d 313 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)