Ricardo Sanchez Enriquez AKA Ricardo Enriquez Sanchez v. State
This text of Ricardo Sanchez Enriquez AKA Ricardo Enriquez Sanchez v. State (Ricardo Sanchez Enriquez AKA Ricardo Enriquez Sanchez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-16-00098-CR
RICARDO SANCHEZ ENRIQUEZ AKA RICARDO ENRIQUEZ SANCHEZ, Appellant v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
From the 54th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2008-1926-C2 ______________
10-16-00099-CR
RICARDO SANCHEZ ENRIQUEZ AKA RICARDO ENRIQUEZ SANCHEZ, Appellant v.
From the 19th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2008-1925-C1
ORDER
There is some confusion as to the correct name of the appellant in these appeals.
The judgments of the trial court, which are the subject of these appeals, reflect appellant’s
name to be Ricardo Sanchez Enriquez. This is the name we used in our dismissal of the
appeals for want of jurisdiction. See Enriquez v. State, Nos. 10-16-00098-CR & 10-16-00099-
CR, 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 3333 (Tex. App.—Waco March 31, 2016, no pet. h.). We have
noticed, however, that the appellant has used the name Ricardo Enriquez Sanchez in each
document he has sent us. We have decided to add the name Ricardo Enriquez Sanchez
to our appellate docketing system so that both names can be located using an electronic
search. We will, however, continue to use the name Ricardo Sanchez Enriquez in any
order or opinion issued from this Court because that is the name reflected in the trial
court’s judgments and that is the name by which the appellant is identified at the Texas
Department of Corrections.
As noted earlier, Ricardo Sanchez Enriquez’s appeals were dismissed for want of
jurisdiction on March 31, 2016. See Enriquez v. State, Nos. 10-16-00098-CR & 10-16-00099-
CR, 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 3333 (Tex. App.—Waco March 31, 2016, no pet. h.). On April
8, 2016, the Clerk of this Court filed what we characterize as Enriquez’s motion for
extension of time to file a motion for rehearing. Enriquez’s motion is granted.
Enriquez v. State Page 2 Enriquez’s Motion for Rehearing was then received on April 18, 2016. However,
the motion only addresses Enriquez’s inability to previously respond with more
information regarding his notice of appeal. It does not address the merits of the Court’s
opinion dismissing Enriquez’s appeals for want of jurisdiction.
Enriquez is ordered to file a supplemental motion for rehearing within 35 days
from the date of this Order which addresses the merits of the opinion previously issued
by the Court on March 31, 2016.
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Supplemental motion ordered Order issued and filed May 5, 2016
Enriquez v. State Page 3
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ricardo Sanchez Enriquez AKA Ricardo Enriquez Sanchez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ricardo-sanchez-enriquez-aka-ricardo-enriquez-sanchez-v-state-texapp-2016.