RICARDO RANGEL v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of RICARDO RANGEL v. STATE OF FLORIDA (RICARDO RANGEL v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
RICARDO RANGEL, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D22-1125
[September 30, 2022]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Jeffrey Dana Gillen, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502013CF009706.
Antony P. Ryan, Director, and Paul O'Neil, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntus, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
KLINGENSMITH, C.J., LEVINE and ARTAU, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
RICARDO RANGEL v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ricardo-rangel-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2022.