Ricardo Hernandez v. Brian Gurley and Cynthia Cruz Gurley

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 26, 2004
Docket13-03-00738-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Ricardo Hernandez v. Brian Gurley and Cynthia Cruz Gurley (Ricardo Hernandez v. Brian Gurley and Cynthia Cruz Gurley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ricardo Hernandez v. Brian Gurley and Cynthia Cruz Gurley, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-03-738-CV


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________


RICARDO HERNANDEZ,                                                    Appellant,


v.


BRIAN GURLEY AND CYNTHIA CRUZ GURLEY,                   Appellees.

___________________________________________________________________


On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

of Hidalgo County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Opinion Per Curiam


         Appellant, RICARDO HERNANDEZ, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 5 of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number CL-41,680-E. Judgment in this cause was signed on July 14, 2003. An untimely motion for new trial was filed on September 3, 2003. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant’s notice of appeal was due on August 13, 2003, but was not filed until November 17, 2003.

         Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court’s letter, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

         The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant’s failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellant’s failure to respond to this Court’s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

                                                               PER CURIAM



Opinion delivered and filed this

the 26th day of February, 2004.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ricardo Hernandez v. Brian Gurley and Cynthia Cruz Gurley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ricardo-hernandez-v-brian-gurley-and-cynthia-cruz--texapp-2004.