Ricardo A. Rodriguez v. Henry Ruiz, M.D.
This text of Ricardo A. Rodriguez v. Henry Ruiz, M.D. (Ricardo A. Rodriguez v. Henry Ruiz, M.D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-12-00762-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE CLAUDIA MARTINEZ AND JUAN MARTINEZ
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Longoria1 Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
Relators, Claudia Martinez and Juan Martinez, filed a petition for writ of
mandamus and motion for immediate temporary relief in the above cause on December
18, 2012. The Court granted the motion for immediate temporary relief, and requested
and received a response to the petition for writ of mandamus from the real party in
interest, Lone Star National Bank.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of
mandamus and the response thereto, is of the opinion that the petition for writ of 1 The Honorable Rose Vela, former Justice of this Court, did not participate in this opinion because her term of office expired on December 31, 2012. In accordance with the appellate rules, she was replaced on panel by Justice Nora Longoria. See TEX. R. APP. P. 41.1(a). mandamus should be denied. Accordingly, the stay previously imposed by this Court is
LIFTED and the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.4,
52.8, 52.10(b).
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 3rd day of January, 2013.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ricardo A. Rodriguez v. Henry Ruiz, M.D., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ricardo-a-rodriguez-v-henry-ruiz-md-texapp-2013.