Ricano v. State

543 So. 2d 863, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1268, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2853, 1989 WL 53457
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 23, 1989·No. No. 88-1774·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We vacate defendant’s sentence and remand to the trial court for resentencing within the guidelines. See Shull v. Dugger, 515 So.2d 748 (Fla.1987). The reasons given by the trial court for departing from the guidelines are invalid, Johnson v. State, 535 So.2d 651 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Alexander v. State, 513 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987), or are unsupported by the record. See State v. Jones, 530 So.2d 53 (Fla.1988); McIntyre v. State, 539 So.2d 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Vacated and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ricano v. State, 543 So. 2d 863, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1268, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2853, 1989 WL 53457 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

543 So. 2d 863 (Ricano v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McIntyre v. State
539 So. 2d 603 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
State v. Jones
530 So. 2d 53 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Alexander v. State
513 So. 2d 1117 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Johnson v. State
535 So. 2d 651 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Shull v. Dugger
515 So. 2d 748 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)