Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Ricano v. State

Ricano v. State

543 So. 2d 863, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1268, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2853, 1989 WL 53457
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 23, 1989
DocketNo. 88-1774
StatusPublished

This text of 543 So. 2d 863 (Ricano v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ricano v. State, 543 So. 2d 863, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1268, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2853, 1989 WL 53457 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We vacate defendant’s sentence and remand to the trial court for resentencing within the guidelines. See Shull v. Dugger, 515 So.2d 748 (Fla.1987). The reasons given by the trial court for departing from the guidelines are invalid, Johnson v. State, 535 So.2d 651 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Alexander v. State, 513 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987), or are unsupported by the record. See State v. Jones, 530 So.2d 53 (Fla.1988); McIntyre v. State, 539 So.2d 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Vacated and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McIntyre v. State
539 So. 2d 603 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
State v. Jones
530 So. 2d 53 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Alexander v. State
513 So. 2d 1117 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Johnson v. State
535 So. 2d 651 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Shull v. Dugger
515 So. 2d 748 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
543 So. 2d 863, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1268, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2853, 1989 WL 53457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ricano-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.