Ribner v. Kleinberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ribner v. Kleinberg

122 N.Y.S. 239

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 8, 1910

StatusPublished

This text of 122 N.Y.S. 239 (Ribner v. Kleinberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ribner v. Kleinberg, 122 N.Y.S. 239 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

SEABURY, J.

Action upon a demand note against the maker. The defendant proved that he was induced to sign the note because it was represented to him that it was a receipt. This evidence was not denied. The defendant also proved that the note was without consideration. It follows that the verdict of' the jury in favor of the plaintiff cannot be sustained.

Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SEABURY, J.

Action upon a demand note against the maker. The defendant proved that he was induced to sign the note because it was represented to him that it was a receipt. This evidence was not denied. The defendant also proved that the note was without consideration. It follows that the verdict of' the jury in favor of the plaintiff cannot be sustained.

Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 N.Y.S. 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ribner-v-kleinberg-nyappdiv-1910.