Ribitzki v. School Bd. of Highlands County

710 So. 2d 226, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5255, 1998 WL 235973
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 13, 1998
Docket97-03845
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 710 So. 2d 226 (Ribitzki v. School Bd. of Highlands County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ribitzki v. School Bd. of Highlands County, 710 So. 2d 226, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5255, 1998 WL 235973 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

710 So.2d 226 (1998)

Dolores RIBITZKI, Appellant,
v.
The SCHOOL BOARD OF HIGHLANDS COUNTY, Appellee.

No. 97-03845.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 13, 1998.

Mark Herdman of Herdman & Sakellarides, P.A., Palm Harbor, for Appellant.

Clay W. Oberhausen of McCollum, Oberhausen & Tuck, L.L.P., Sebring, for Appellee.

WHATLEY, Acting Chief Judge.

Dolores Ribitzki appeals the order dismissing with prejudice her action against The School Board of Highlands County (the School Board) for unpaid overtime pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The trial court granted the School Board's motion to dismiss "based upon sovereign immunity of the states as provided by the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution." We reverse because this is an incorrect application of the Eleventh Amendment.

"No Eleventh Amendment question is present, of course, where an action is brought in a state court since the Amendment, by its terms, restrains only `[t]he Judicial power of the United States.'" Maine v. Thiboutot, 448 U.S. 1, 9 n. 7, 100 S.Ct. 2502, 2507 n. 7, 65 L.Ed.2d 555 (1980). Accord Hilton v. South Carolina Pub. Rys. Comm'n, 502 U.S. 197, 112 S.Ct. 560, 116 L.Ed.2d 560 (1991). Thus, the Eleventh Amendment does not immunize the School Board from an FLSA action brought in state court.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for reinstatement of Ribitzki's complaint.

NORTHCUTT and CASANUEVA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kuebel v. Department of Wildlife & Fisheries
14 So. 3d 20 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2009)
Alden v. State
1998 ME 200 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
710 So. 2d 226, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5255, 1998 WL 235973, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ribitzki-v-school-bd-of-highlands-county-fladistctapp-1998.