Rial v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rial v. State

835 So. 2d 291, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18573, 2002 WL 31828244

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 18, 2002

DocketNo. 3D01-1424

StatusPublished

This text of 835 So. 2d 291 (Rial v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rial v. State, 835 So. 2d 291, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18573, 2002 WL 31828244 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Christina Rial appeals from an order of revocation of probation and community control and sentence. For the following reasons, we reverse.

Defendant entered into a plea agreement whereby she pled guilty to the charges brought against her in exchange for two years community control followed by ten years probation, with a special condition that she complete the Start program and then enter the Passageways program. Both the Start and Passageways programs are non-secure mental health facilities.

After completing the Start program, Defendant entered Passageways. Shortly thereafter, defendant asked to leave the program. Defendant’s community control officer told her that if she left Passageways, she would be in violation of probation. Defendant absconded three weeks later, but returned after five days.

After a hearing, the trial court found that defendant willfully violated her probation by absconding from Passageways and sentenced defendant to thirty years in prison. As the terms of defendant’s probation did not require that she complete the Passageways program, but only that she enter it, the trial court erred in finding that defendant violated her probation when she absconded from the program. See Carter v. State, 763 So.2d 1091, (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (holding probation should not be revoked for failure to complete when a condition of probation does not require completion or have a time limit). See also Bingham v. State, 655 So.2d 1186 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Defendant satisfied the conditions of her probation by completing the Start program and entering Passageways. Requiring that defendant complete the Passageways program constitutes “an unauthorized and impermissible upward modification of [defendant’s] probation conditions.” Bell v. State, 643 So.2d 674, 675 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

Accordingly, defendant’s probation and community control should not have been revoked. Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Christina Rial appeals from an order of revocation of probation and community control and sentence. For the following reasons, we reverse.

Defendant entered into a plea agreement whereby she pled guilty to the charges brought against her in exchange for two years community control followed by ten years probation, with a special condition that she complete the Start program and then enter the Passageways program. Both the Start and Passageways programs are non-secure mental health facilities.

After completing the Start program, Defendant entered Passageways. Shortly thereafter, defendant asked to leave the program. Defendant’s community control officer told her that if she left Passageways, she would be in violation of probation. Defendant absconded three weeks later, but returned after five days.

After a hearing, the trial court found that defendant willfully violated her probation by absconding from Passageways and sentenced defendant to thirty years in prison. As the terms of defendant’s probation did not require that she complete the Passageways program, but only that she enter it, the trial court erred in finding that defendant violated her probation when she absconded from the program. See Carter v. State, 763 So.2d 1091, (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (holding probation should not be revoked for failure to complete when a condition of probation does not require completion or have a time limit). See also Bingham v. State, 655 So.2d 1186 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Defendant satisfied the conditions of her probation by completing the Start program and entering Passageways. Requiring that defendant complete the Passageways program constitutes “an unauthorized and impermissible upward modification of [defendant’s] probation conditions.” Bell v. State, 643 So.2d 674, 675 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

Accordingly, defendant’s probation and community control should not have been revoked. Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

835 So. 2d 291, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18573, 2002 WL 31828244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rial-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack