RHUNETTE WILLIFORD v. HOWARD E. MCCLAIN, JUDGE

Court of Appeals of Georgia

RHUNETTE WILLIFORD v. HOWARD E. MCCLAIN, JUDGE

DecidedOctober 15, 2024

DocketA25E0029

StatusPublished

This text of RHUNETTE WILLIFORD v. HOWARD E. MCCLAIN, JUDGE (RHUNETTE WILLIFORD v. HOWARD E. MCCLAIN, JUDGE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

RHUNETTE WILLIFORD v. HOWARD E. MCCLAIN, JUDGE, (Ga. Ct. App. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ October 15, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25E0029. RHUNETTE WILLIFORD et al v. HOWARD E. MCCLAIN, Judge.

Appellant filed a petition for writ of mandamus on October 13, 2024, requesting this Court issue a mandamus to Appellee requiring the Appellee to execute a written order so Appellant could exercise their appellate rights. Subsequently, a hearing was held on October 14, 2024, in which a written order was entered. As a result, the petition fails to establish that invocation of this Court’s Rule 40 (c) jurisdiction is warranted under the facts of this case. See Court of Appeals Rule 40 (c). Therefore, Appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 10/15/2024 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ October 15, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25E0029. RHUNETTE WILLIFORD et al v. HOWARD E. MCCLAIN, Judge.

Appellant filed a petition for writ of mandamus on October 13, 2024, requesting this Court issue a mandamus to Appellee requiring the Appellee to execute a written order so Appellant could exercise their appellate rights. Subsequently, a hearing was held on October 14, 2024, in which a written order was entered. As a result, the petition fails to establish that invocation of this Court’s Rule 40 (c) jurisdiction is warranted under the facts of this case. See Court of Appeals Rule 40 (c). Therefore, Appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 10/15/2024 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

RHUNETTE WILLIFORD v. HOWARD E. MCCLAIN, JUDGE, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rhunette-williford-v-howard-e-mcclain-judge-gactapp-2024.