RHR Global, LLC v. Alfred I. Rolle, III
This text of RHR Global, LLC v. Alfred I. Rolle, III (RHR Global, LLC v. Alfred I. Rolle, III) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed January 21, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D24-2102 Lower Tribunal No. 17-22761-CA-01 ________________
RHR Global, LLC, Appellant,
vs.
Alfred I. Rolle, III, et al., Appellees.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Spencer Eig, Judge.
Christian Carrazana, P.A., and Christian Carrazana, for appellant.
No appearance, for appellees.
Before GORDO, LOBREE and BOKOR, JJ.
BOKOR, J. RHR Global, LLC, the plaintiff below, appeals an order dismissing the
action for lack of prosecution.1 See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.420(e). RHR identifies
record activity within the 60 days immediately following service of the court’s
notice of intent to dismiss for failure to prosecute. See id. (providing for
dismissal where there is no record activity for 10 months immediately
preceding the service of notice and no record activity in the 60 days
immediately following service). Because the record reflects activity within the
60-day period immediately following the service of the notice, the court erred
in entering the order of dismissal. See Waldeck v. MacDougall, 300 So. 3d
1218, 1219–20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020).
Reversed.
1 No appearance was entered for the appellees and no answer brief was filed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
RHR Global, LLC v. Alfred I. Rolle, III, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rhr-global-llc-v-alfred-i-rolle-iii-fladistctapp-2026.