Rhone v. Rhone

505 So. 2d 586, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7639
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 10, 1987·No. No. 86-813·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Pratt v. Pratt, 502 So.2d 1001 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Hoyt v. Hoyt, 457 So.2d 599 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). In this case, we find no difference between joint tenants by the entireties and tenants in common. We find no merit in appellant’s third point.

LEHAN, A.C.J., SANDERLIN, J., and BOARDMAN, EDWARD F., (Ret.) J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rhone v. Rhone, 505 So. 2d 586, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7639 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

505 So. 2d 586 (Rhone v. Rhone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoyt v. Hoyt
457 So. 2d 599 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Pratt v. Pratt
502 So. 2d 1001 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)