Rhone v. Rhone

505 So. 2d 586, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7639
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 10, 1987
DocketNo. 86-813
StatusPublished

This text of 505 So. 2d 586 (Rhone v. Rhone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rhone v. Rhone, 505 So. 2d 586, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7639 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Pratt v. Pratt, 502 So.2d 1001 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Hoyt v. Hoyt, 457 So.2d 599 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). In this case, we find no difference between joint tenants by the entireties and tenants in common. We find no merit in appellant’s third point.

LEHAN, A.C.J., SANDERLIN, J., and BOARDMAN, EDWARD F., (Ret.) J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoyt v. Hoyt
457 So. 2d 599 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Pratt v. Pratt
502 So. 2d 1001 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
505 So. 2d 586, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rhone-v-rhone-fladistctapp-1987.