I N THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
EASTERN SECTI ON
RHONDA LEE SM TH ( BALI LES) I ) BRADLEY COUNTY ) 03A01- 9606- CH- 00195 Pl a i nt i f f - Appe l l a nt ) ) ) v. ) HON. EARL H. HENLEY, ) CHANCELLOR ) HOM BENEFI CI AL LI FE E ) APPEAL DI SM SSED I N PART; I I NSURANCE COMPANY ) J UDGMENT AFFI RMED I N PART, ) VACATED I N PART, a nd REM ANDED De f e nda nt - Appe l l e e )
W LLI AM J . BROW OF CLEVELAND FOR APPELLANT I N
M CHAEL E. CALLAW OF CLEVELAND FOR APPELLEE I AY
CHARLES W BURSON, At t or ne y Ge ne r a l a nd Re por t e r , a nd . J OHN A. MOORE, As s i s t a nt At t or ne y Ge ne r a l , NASHVI LLE, FOR LARRY W ALLACE, Di r e c t or o f t he TENNESSEE BUREAU OF I NVESTI GATI ON
O P I N I O N
Godda r d, P. J .
Thi s c a s e i s be f or e us pur s ua nt t o t he gr a nt of t wo
Ru l e 9 I nt e r l oc ut or y Appe a l s , one t o Pl a i nt i f f Rhonda Le e Smi t h
a nd t h e ot he r t o La r r y W l l a c e , i n hi s of f i c i a l c a pa c i t y a s a
Di r e c t o r of t he Te nne s s e e Bur e a u of I nve s t i ga t i on. The s ui t gi vi ng r i s e t o t he s e a ppe a l s s t e ms f r om t he
d i s a p p e a r a nc e of Cha r l e s Ve r non Smi t h i n J une of 1985, whi l e h e 1 wa s ma r r i e d t o M . Ba l i l e s . s Pr i or t o hi s di s a ppe a r a nc e , M . r
Smi t h p ur c ha s e d a whol e l i f e i ns ur a nc e pol i c y f r om Home
Be n e f i c i a l i n t he a mount of $100, 000 wi t h a c c i de nt a l de a t h
b e n e f i t s i n a n a ddi t i ona l a mount of $100, 000. Thi s pol i c y na me d
M . Ba l i l e s a s t he b e ne f i c i a r y. s I t i s M . Ba l i l e s ' s t he or y t ha t
M . Smi t h wa s t he vi c t i m of a c ont r a c t ki l l i ng by Bobby Cha dwi c k r
a t t h e i ns t a nc e of De no M Ke nz i e . c
Al t hough ot he r i s s ue s a r e r a i s e d i n t hi s Cour t , we ma y
o n l y c o n s i de r t hos e i s s ue s s pe c i f i e d i n t he Tr i a l Cour t ' s or de r s
g r a n t i n g t he s e a ppe a l s :
MS. BALI LES APPEAL
I t i s t he r e f or e ORDERED, ADJ UDGED AND DECREED THAT t h e mot i on of t he de f e nda nt Home Be ne f i c i a l Li f e I n s ur a nc e Compa ny t o s t r i ke t he de pos i t i ons of Shi r l e y Ha mi l t on a nd Spe c i a l Age nt Ge r a l d Pr e s l e y of t he Te nne s s e e Bur e a u of I nve s t i ga t i on i s gr a nt e d.
I t i s f ur t he r ORDERED t ha t t he pl a i nt i f f i s g r a nt e d a n i nt e r l oc ut or y a ppe a l t o t he Cour t of Appe a l s a s t o t he i s s ue s of t he s t r i ki ng of t he de pos i t i ons a s we l l a s t he pl a i nt i f f ' s mot i on f or s umma r y j udgme nt , a n d t he t r i a l da t e of Apr i l 29, 1996 i s c ont i nue d p e ndi ng t hi s a ppe a l .
1 S h e wa s s u b s e q u e n t l y d i v o r c e d f r o m M . r S mi t h o n J u l y 3 1 , 1985.
2 MR. WALLACE' S APPEAL
It is f ur t he r ORDERED t ha t t he Te nne s s e e Bur e a u of I n ve s t i ga t i on a nd Spe c i a l Age nt Ge r a l d Pr e s l e y a r e g r a nt e d a n i nt e r l oc ut or y a ppe a l t o t he Cour t of Appe a l s a s t o t he i s s ue of whe t he r t he de pos i t i ons a r e p r i vi l e ge d a nd not s ubj e c t t o i nt r oduc t i on a s e vi de nc e at t r i al .
I n a ddr e s s i ng t he f i r s t poi nt s r a i s e d by M . Ba l i l e s , s
we mu s t f i r s t l ook t o t he de f i ni t i on of he a r s a y f ound i n Rul e 8 0 1
o f t h e Te nne s s e e Rul e s of Evi de nc e :
Rul e 8 01. De f i ni t i ons .
The f ol l owi ng de f i ni t i ons a ppl y unde r t hi s ar t i cl e: ( a ) St a t e me nt . A " s t a t e me nt " i s ( 1) a n or a l or wr i t t e n a s s e r t i on or ( 2) nonve r ba l c onduc t of a pe r s on i f i t i s i nt e nde d by t he pe r s on a s a n a s s e r t i on. ( b) De c l a r a nt . A " d e c l a r a nt " i s a pe r s on who ma ke s a s t a t e me nt . ( c ) He a r s a y. " He a r s a y" i s a s t a t e me nt , 2 ot he r t ha n o n e ma de by t he de c l a r a nt whi l e t e s t i f yi ng a t t he t r i a l o r he a r i ng, of f e r e d i n e vi de nc e t o pr ove t he t r ut h of t h e ma t t e r a s s e r t e d.
A c ur s or y e xa mi na t i on of t he de pos i t i on of Shi r l e y
Ha mi l t o n a nd Spe c i a l Age nt Pr e s l e y de mons t r a t e s t ha t c e r t a i n
t e s t i mo ny e l i c i t e d i s c l e a r l y not he a r s a y. For e xa mpl e , a s t o
M . Ha mi l t on, s he t e s t i f i e d a s t o t he f ol l owi ng f a c t s a bout t he s
t i me of M . Smi t h' s d i s a pp e a r a nc e : r
2 Or a l or wr i t t e n o r non- ve r ba l conduc t i nt e nde d as an a s s e r t i on.
3 1. He r t he n hus ba nd, Bobby Cha dwi c k, c a me i nt o t he i r
h o me a n d " ha d bl ood down hi s s hi r t , down hi s pa nt s . "
Ad d i t i o na l l y, on t hi s oc c a s i on, " he ha d a bi l l f ol d s t r e t c he d o u t
i n h i s ha nd. I s e e n - - I don' t know i f i t wa s a dr i ve r ' s l i c e n s e
o r a n I D or wha t . I t j us t ha d a pi c t ur e of M . Smi t h. " r On t h e
s a me o c c a s i on, he t ook out a r e vol ve r a nd l a i d i t on t he c of f e e
t a bl e . For s e ve r a l d a ys t he r e a f t e r , M . Smi t h wa s s i c k a nd c ou l d r
n o t e a t nor dr i nk.
2. Tha t s ome t i me l a t e r , a t he r hus ba nd' s r e que s t , s h e
a c c o mp a ni e d hi m t o t he home of De no M Ke nz i e , whe r e he r e move d a n c
e n v e l o p e f r om M . M Ke nz i e ' s ma i l box a nd ha nde d i t t o he r . r c W en h
s h e o p e ne d t he e nve l ope s he f ound i t c ont a i ne d $3000.
I t f ur t he r a ppe a r s t ha t e ve n s ome s t a t e me nt s t ha t a r e
h e a r s a y mi ght be e xc e pt i ons t o t he ge ne r a l r ul e . Rul e 803,
Te n n e s s e e Rul e s of Evi de nc e , 3r d Ed. W a l s o poi nt out wi t hou t e
t r y i n g t o mi c r o- ma na ge t he Cha nc e l l or ' s t r i a l of t hi s c a s e t ha t
q u e s t i o ns a nd c omma nds a r e a s a ge ne r a l r ul e a dmi s s i bl e . Se c t i o n
8 0 1 . 9 , Te nne s s e e La w of Ev i de nc e , 3r d Ed.
Fi na l l y, a s t o t ha t por t i on of M . Ba l i l e s ' s a ppe a l
wh i c h a s s e r t s s he s houl d ha ve be e n gr a nt e d a s umma r y j udgme nt , we
c a n n o t f i nd t ha t t he undi s put e d pr oof s hows M . Smi t h i s de c e a s e d r
o r t h a t hi s de a t h r e s ul t e d a s a l l e ge d i n t he c ompl a i nt " f r om
b o d i l y i nj ur i e s s us t a i ne d t hr ough e xt e r na l , vi ol e nt , a nd
a c c i d e nt a l me a ns . "
4 As t o t he de pos i t i on of Spe c i a l Age nt Pr e s l e y, we
r e c o g n i z e t ha t muc h of i t mi ght not be a dmi s s i bl e a s vi ol a t i ve o f
t h e h e a r s a y r ul e but ot he r por t i ons a r e a nd, wi t h t hi s de pos i t i o n
a s wi t h t he de pos i t i on of M . Ha mi l t on, t he r ul i ngs of t he Tr i a l s
Co u r t s houl d be on a n a ns we r - by- a ns we r ba s i s whi c h c oul d ve r y
we l l b e i nf l ue nc e d by t he t e s t i mony r e c e i ve d a t t r i a l pr i or t o
t h e o f f e r of t he t e s t i mony c ont a i ne d i n t he de pos i t i ons .
I t a ppe a r s t he pr i nc i pa l c onc e r n a s t o M . W l l a c e ' s r a
a p p e a l i s t ha t M . Ha mi l t on' s na me woul d be c ome known t o M . s r
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
I N THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
EASTERN SECTI ON
RHONDA LEE SM TH ( BALI LES) I ) BRADLEY COUNTY ) 03A01- 9606- CH- 00195 Pl a i nt i f f - Appe l l a nt ) ) ) v. ) HON. EARL H. HENLEY, ) CHANCELLOR ) HOM BENEFI CI AL LI FE E ) APPEAL DI SM SSED I N PART; I I NSURANCE COMPANY ) J UDGMENT AFFI RMED I N PART, ) VACATED I N PART, a nd REM ANDED De f e nda nt - Appe l l e e )
W LLI AM J . BROW OF CLEVELAND FOR APPELLANT I N
M CHAEL E. CALLAW OF CLEVELAND FOR APPELLEE I AY
CHARLES W BURSON, At t or ne y Ge ne r a l a nd Re por t e r , a nd . J OHN A. MOORE, As s i s t a nt At t or ne y Ge ne r a l , NASHVI LLE, FOR LARRY W ALLACE, Di r e c t or o f t he TENNESSEE BUREAU OF I NVESTI GATI ON
O P I N I O N
Godda r d, P. J .
Thi s c a s e i s be f or e us pur s ua nt t o t he gr a nt of t wo
Ru l e 9 I nt e r l oc ut or y Appe a l s , one t o Pl a i nt i f f Rhonda Le e Smi t h
a nd t h e ot he r t o La r r y W l l a c e , i n hi s of f i c i a l c a pa c i t y a s a
Di r e c t o r of t he Te nne s s e e Bur e a u of I nve s t i ga t i on. The s ui t gi vi ng r i s e t o t he s e a ppe a l s s t e ms f r om t he
d i s a p p e a r a nc e of Cha r l e s Ve r non Smi t h i n J une of 1985, whi l e h e 1 wa s ma r r i e d t o M . Ba l i l e s . s Pr i or t o hi s di s a ppe a r a nc e , M . r
Smi t h p ur c ha s e d a whol e l i f e i ns ur a nc e pol i c y f r om Home
Be n e f i c i a l i n t he a mount of $100, 000 wi t h a c c i de nt a l de a t h
b e n e f i t s i n a n a ddi t i ona l a mount of $100, 000. Thi s pol i c y na me d
M . Ba l i l e s a s t he b e ne f i c i a r y. s I t i s M . Ba l i l e s ' s t he or y t ha t
M . Smi t h wa s t he vi c t i m of a c ont r a c t ki l l i ng by Bobby Cha dwi c k r
a t t h e i ns t a nc e of De no M Ke nz i e . c
Al t hough ot he r i s s ue s a r e r a i s e d i n t hi s Cour t , we ma y
o n l y c o n s i de r t hos e i s s ue s s pe c i f i e d i n t he Tr i a l Cour t ' s or de r s
g r a n t i n g t he s e a ppe a l s :
MS. BALI LES APPEAL
I t i s t he r e f or e ORDERED, ADJ UDGED AND DECREED THAT t h e mot i on of t he de f e nda nt Home Be ne f i c i a l Li f e I n s ur a nc e Compa ny t o s t r i ke t he de pos i t i ons of Shi r l e y Ha mi l t on a nd Spe c i a l Age nt Ge r a l d Pr e s l e y of t he Te nne s s e e Bur e a u of I nve s t i ga t i on i s gr a nt e d.
I t i s f ur t he r ORDERED t ha t t he pl a i nt i f f i s g r a nt e d a n i nt e r l oc ut or y a ppe a l t o t he Cour t of Appe a l s a s t o t he i s s ue s of t he s t r i ki ng of t he de pos i t i ons a s we l l a s t he pl a i nt i f f ' s mot i on f or s umma r y j udgme nt , a n d t he t r i a l da t e of Apr i l 29, 1996 i s c ont i nue d p e ndi ng t hi s a ppe a l .
1 S h e wa s s u b s e q u e n t l y d i v o r c e d f r o m M . r S mi t h o n J u l y 3 1 , 1985.
2 MR. WALLACE' S APPEAL
It is f ur t he r ORDERED t ha t t he Te nne s s e e Bur e a u of I n ve s t i ga t i on a nd Spe c i a l Age nt Ge r a l d Pr e s l e y a r e g r a nt e d a n i nt e r l oc ut or y a ppe a l t o t he Cour t of Appe a l s a s t o t he i s s ue of whe t he r t he de pos i t i ons a r e p r i vi l e ge d a nd not s ubj e c t t o i nt r oduc t i on a s e vi de nc e at t r i al .
I n a ddr e s s i ng t he f i r s t poi nt s r a i s e d by M . Ba l i l e s , s
we mu s t f i r s t l ook t o t he de f i ni t i on of he a r s a y f ound i n Rul e 8 0 1
o f t h e Te nne s s e e Rul e s of Evi de nc e :
Rul e 8 01. De f i ni t i ons .
The f ol l owi ng de f i ni t i ons a ppl y unde r t hi s ar t i cl e: ( a ) St a t e me nt . A " s t a t e me nt " i s ( 1) a n or a l or wr i t t e n a s s e r t i on or ( 2) nonve r ba l c onduc t of a pe r s on i f i t i s i nt e nde d by t he pe r s on a s a n a s s e r t i on. ( b) De c l a r a nt . A " d e c l a r a nt " i s a pe r s on who ma ke s a s t a t e me nt . ( c ) He a r s a y. " He a r s a y" i s a s t a t e me nt , 2 ot he r t ha n o n e ma de by t he de c l a r a nt whi l e t e s t i f yi ng a t t he t r i a l o r he a r i ng, of f e r e d i n e vi de nc e t o pr ove t he t r ut h of t h e ma t t e r a s s e r t e d.
A c ur s or y e xa mi na t i on of t he de pos i t i on of Shi r l e y
Ha mi l t o n a nd Spe c i a l Age nt Pr e s l e y de mons t r a t e s t ha t c e r t a i n
t e s t i mo ny e l i c i t e d i s c l e a r l y not he a r s a y. For e xa mpl e , a s t o
M . Ha mi l t on, s he t e s t i f i e d a s t o t he f ol l owi ng f a c t s a bout t he s
t i me of M . Smi t h' s d i s a pp e a r a nc e : r
2 Or a l or wr i t t e n o r non- ve r ba l conduc t i nt e nde d as an a s s e r t i on.
3 1. He r t he n hus ba nd, Bobby Cha dwi c k, c a me i nt o t he i r
h o me a n d " ha d bl ood down hi s s hi r t , down hi s pa nt s . "
Ad d i t i o na l l y, on t hi s oc c a s i on, " he ha d a bi l l f ol d s t r e t c he d o u t
i n h i s ha nd. I s e e n - - I don' t know i f i t wa s a dr i ve r ' s l i c e n s e
o r a n I D or wha t . I t j us t ha d a pi c t ur e of M . Smi t h. " r On t h e
s a me o c c a s i on, he t ook out a r e vol ve r a nd l a i d i t on t he c of f e e
t a bl e . For s e ve r a l d a ys t he r e a f t e r , M . Smi t h wa s s i c k a nd c ou l d r
n o t e a t nor dr i nk.
2. Tha t s ome t i me l a t e r , a t he r hus ba nd' s r e que s t , s h e
a c c o mp a ni e d hi m t o t he home of De no M Ke nz i e , whe r e he r e move d a n c
e n v e l o p e f r om M . M Ke nz i e ' s ma i l box a nd ha nde d i t t o he r . r c W en h
s h e o p e ne d t he e nve l ope s he f ound i t c ont a i ne d $3000.
I t f ur t he r a ppe a r s t ha t e ve n s ome s t a t e me nt s t ha t a r e
h e a r s a y mi ght be e xc e pt i ons t o t he ge ne r a l r ul e . Rul e 803,
Te n n e s s e e Rul e s of Evi de nc e , 3r d Ed. W a l s o poi nt out wi t hou t e
t r y i n g t o mi c r o- ma na ge t he Cha nc e l l or ' s t r i a l of t hi s c a s e t ha t
q u e s t i o ns a nd c omma nds a r e a s a ge ne r a l r ul e a dmi s s i bl e . Se c t i o n
8 0 1 . 9 , Te nne s s e e La w of Ev i de nc e , 3r d Ed.
Fi na l l y, a s t o t ha t por t i on of M . Ba l i l e s ' s a ppe a l
wh i c h a s s e r t s s he s houl d ha ve be e n gr a nt e d a s umma r y j udgme nt , we
c a n n o t f i nd t ha t t he undi s put e d pr oof s hows M . Smi t h i s de c e a s e d r
o r t h a t hi s de a t h r e s ul t e d a s a l l e ge d i n t he c ompl a i nt " f r om
b o d i l y i nj ur i e s s us t a i ne d t hr ough e xt e r na l , vi ol e nt , a nd
a c c i d e nt a l me a ns . "
4 As t o t he de pos i t i on of Spe c i a l Age nt Pr e s l e y, we
r e c o g n i z e t ha t muc h of i t mi ght not be a dmi s s i bl e a s vi ol a t i ve o f
t h e h e a r s a y r ul e but ot he r por t i ons a r e a nd, wi t h t hi s de pos i t i o n
a s wi t h t he de pos i t i on of M . Ha mi l t on, t he r ul i ngs of t he Tr i a l s
Co u r t s houl d be on a n a ns we r - by- a ns we r ba s i s whi c h c oul d ve r y
we l l b e i nf l ue nc e d by t he t e s t i mony r e c e i ve d a t t r i a l pr i or t o
t h e o f f e r of t he t e s t i mony c ont a i ne d i n t he de pos i t i ons .
I t a ppe a r s t he pr i nc i pa l c onc e r n a s t o M . W l l a c e ' s r a
a p p e a l i s t ha t M . Ha mi l t on' s na me woul d be c ome known t o M . s r
Ch a d wi c k whi c h woul d pl a c e he r i n pe r i l . The r e c or d di s c l os e s
t h a t M . Cha dwi c k kne w t ha t M . Ha mi l t on wa s f ur ni s hi ng r s
i n f o r ma t i on t o t he l a w e nf or c e me nt a ut hor i t y a nd gr a nt i ng a
p r i v i l e ge t o pr ot e c t he r woul d be f ut i l e . W a c c or di ngl y e
c o n c l u d e t ha t our gr a nt of a n i nt e r l oc ut or y a ppe a l a s t o M . r
W l l a c e wa s i mpr ovi de nt a nd hi s a ppe a l i s a c c or di ngl y di s mi s s e d . a
For t he f or e goi ng r e a s ons we di s mi s s t he a ppe a l of M . r
W l l a c e , v a c a t e t he o r de r of t he Tr i a l Cour t s t r i ki ng t he a
d e p o s i t i ons of M . Ha mi l t on a nd Spe c i a l Age nt Pr e s l e y, a nd a f f i r m s
h i s o r d e r de nyi ng s umma r y j udgme nt t o M . Ba l i l e s . s The c a us e i s
r e ma n d e d f or f ur t he r pr oc e e di ngs not i nc ons i s t e nt wi t h t hi s
opi ni on. Cos t s of a ppe a l a r e a dj udge d one - ha l f a ga i ns t M . s
Ba l i l e s a nd o ne - ha l f a ga i ns t Home Be ne f i c i a l .
5 _______________________________ Hous t on M Godda r d, P. J . .
CONCUR:
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _________________________ Ch a r l e s D. Sus a no, J r . , J .
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ________________________ W l l i a m H. I nma n, Sr . J . i