Rhome v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rhome v. State

231 So. 2d 288, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6932

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rhome v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 222 So. 2d 431 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 17, 1970·No. No. 69-459·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant plead not guilty to a charge of murder in the first degree, was tried and found guilty as charged, by a jury, with [289]*289a recommendation of mercy. Thereupon he was sentenced to a term of life in the state penitentiary.

The several grounds relied on by appellant for reversal have been carefully considered in the light of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, and we have concluded therefrom that no reversible error has been shown. The record discloses that the case was fully and fairly tried, that the jury verdict is supported by the evidence and that the rulings of the trial court challenged by the appellant did not, on the record and under the law, constitute reversible error. Therefore, the judgment and sentence appealed are affirmed. See Stewart v. State, Fla.App.1969, 221 So.2d 155; Williams v. State, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 654; Feldman v. State, Fla.App.1968, 212 So.2d 21.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant plead not guilty to a charge of murder in the first degree, was tried and found guilty as charged, by a jury, with [289]*289a recommendation of mercy. Thereupon he was sentenced to a term of life in the state penitentiary.

The several grounds relied on by appellant for reversal have been carefully considered in the light of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, and we have concluded therefrom that no reversible error has been shown. The record discloses that the case was fully and fairly tried, that the jury verdict is supported by the evidence and that the rulings of the trial court challenged by the appellant did not, on the record and under the law, constitute reversible error. Therefore, the judgment and sentence appealed are affirmed. See Stewart v. State, Fla.App.1969, 221 So.2d 155; Williams v. State, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 654; Feldman v. State, Fla.App.1968, 212 So.2d 21.

Affirmed.

Rhome v. State, 231 So. 2d 288, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6932 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

231 So. 2d 288 (Rhome v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related