Rhome v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rhome v. State

231 So. 2d 288, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6932

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 17, 1970

DocketNo. 69-459

StatusPublished

This text of 231 So. 2d 288 (Rhome v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rhome v. State, 231 So. 2d 288, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6932 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant plead not guilty to a charge of murder in the first degree, was tried and found guilty as charged, by a jury, with [289]*289a recommendation of mercy. Thereupon he was sentenced to a term of life in the state penitentiary.

The several grounds relied on by appellant for reversal have been carefully considered in the light of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, and we have concluded therefrom that no reversible error has been shown. The record discloses that the case was fully and fairly tried, that the jury verdict is supported by the evidence and that the rulings of the trial court challenged by the appellant did not, on the record and under the law, constitute reversible error. Therefore, the judgment and sentence appealed are affirmed. See Stewart v. State, Fla.App.1969, 221 So.2d 155; Williams v. State, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 654; Feldman v. State, Fla.App.1968, 212 So.2d 21.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant plead not guilty to a charge of murder in the first degree, was tried and found guilty as charged, by a jury, with [289]*289a recommendation of mercy. Thereupon he was sentenced to a term of life in the state penitentiary.

The several grounds relied on by appellant for reversal have been carefully considered in the light of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, and we have concluded therefrom that no reversible error has been shown. The record discloses that the case was fully and fairly tried, that the jury verdict is supported by the evidence and that the rulings of the trial court challenged by the appellant did not, on the record and under the law, constitute reversible error. Therefore, the judgment and sentence appealed are affirmed. See Stewart v. State, Fla.App.1969, 221 So.2d 155; Williams v. State, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 654; Feldman v. State, Fla.App.1968, 212 So.2d 21.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

231 So. 2d 288, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rhome-v-state-fladistctapp-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack