Home/Supreme Court/Rhodus v. Manning

Rhodus v. Manning

217 U.S. 597, 30 S. Ct. 696
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 31, 1910
Docket739, 740, 741, 742
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 217 U.S. 597 (Rhodus v. Manning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rhodus v. Manning, 217 U.S. 597, 30 S. Ct. 696 (1910).

Opinion

217 U.S. 597 (1910)

THOMAS RHODUS
v.
MANNING.
SAME
v.
SAME.
BIRCH F. RHODUS
v.
SAME.
SAME
v.
SAME.

Nos. 739, 740, 741, 742.

Supreme Court of United States.

Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted May 16, 1910.
Decided May 31, 1910.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS.

*598 Mr. Benjamin C. Bachrach and Mr. Joseph B. David for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Samuel Alschuler, Mr. Charles R. Holden and Mr. Joseph Weissenbach for defendants in error.

Per Curiam.

Judgments affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Marriage of Hellwig
426 N.E.2d 1087 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
217 U.S. 597, 30 S. Ct. 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rhodus-v-manning-scotus-1910.