Rhodium Special Opportunity Fund, LLC v. Life Trading Holdco, LLC
This text of 128 A.D.3d 542 (Rhodium Special Opportunity Fund, LLC v. Life Trading Holdco, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Melvin L. Schweizer, J.), entered April 2, 2014, which granted defendant Life Trading Holdco, LLC’s (defendant) motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1), unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to plaintiffs assertion, the parties’ confidentiality agreement was unambiguous, and by its plain language barred any claim for failing to negotiate or enter into a transaction to purchase the assets at issue, unless and until the parties had signed a definitive written agreement (see Slattery Skanska Inc. v American Home Assur. Co., 67 AD3d 1, 13-14 [1st Dept 2009]). Thus, defendant’s submission of the confidentiality agreement, coupled with plaintiffs failure to plead the existence of the requisite agreement, was fatal to plaintiffs complaint (see Jordan Panel Sys. Corp. v Turner Constr. Co., 45 AD3d 165, 172-173 [1st Dept 2007]). The requirement of an executed, definitive written agreement was also fatal to plaintiffs claims, first asserted on appeal, of breach of the covenant of good faith (see id.) and promissory estoppel (Prospect St. Ventures I, LLC v Eclipsys Solutions Corp., 23 AD3d 213 [1st Dept 2005]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Acosta, Saxe, ManzanetDaniels and Clark, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
128 A.D.3d 542, 8 N.Y.S.3d 561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rhodium-special-opportunity-fund-llc-v-life-trading-holdco-llc-nyappdiv-2015.